On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote: > In article <nad-B4E67A.00475902102012 at news.gmane.org>, > Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote: >> In article <20121002073135.GA26567 at sleipnir.bytereef.org>, >> Stefan Krah <stefan at bytereef.org> wrote: >> > Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote: >> > > > Forgot the link... >> > > > http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7885 >> > > > On Monday, October 1, 2012, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> > > > > As discussed here, the python 2.5 binary distributed by Apple on >> > > > > mountain >> > > > > lion is broken. Could someone file an official complaint? >> > > I've filed a bug against 10.8 python2.5. The 10.8 versions of Apple's >> > > pythons are compile with clang and we did see some sign extension issues >> > > with ctypes. The 10.7 version of Apple's python2.5 is compiled with >> > > llvm-gcc and handles 2**31 correctly. >> > Yes, this looks like http://bugs.python.org/issue11149 . >> Ah, right, thanks. I've updated the Apple issue accordingly. > > Update: the bug I filed has been closed as a duplicate of #11932488 > which apparently at the moment is still open. No other information is > available. Thanks Ned! Is there any way that I could see that bug myself and attach myself to updates? Otherwise, can you keep us here appraised of developments (even if Apple decides not to fix it)? -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4