Zitat von Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: > Regardless of when the first alpha happens, I'll be promoting the hell > out of it, begging for feedback on any of these changes that are > available by then (which should be quite a few, given the preceding > PyCon US sprints). However, I would *like* to have months rather than > weeks to act on any feedback we do receive. I'm not asking the release > team to do any more work - I'm just asking for a chunk of it to be > brought forward a few months. If I was asking for an *extra* release, > I could understand resistance to the idea, but what's the concrete > benefit of *delaying* the first alpha release by 4 months from when > I'm hoping to see it happen? I wouldn't mind having alpha 1 in April 2013, and alpha 2 in October 2013. I share Larry's skepticism, and actually fear that it may confuse users (which find that they test something completely different from what gets released). However, I don't mind supporting this strategy anyway as an experiment. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4