On 03.10.12 19:02, Larry Hastings wrote: > But my suspicion is that most people who > try the alphas are doing early integration testing with their own > stuff. For those people, the earlier the alpha, the less interesting it > probably is to them. Earlier means that the software will be less > finished. It will be buggier, it won't have as many features as the > beta will. As a result it won't be as revealing--or as relevant--as a > later alpha or even a beta. If that's their perspective, I suspect > they'll be less likely to try an earlier alpha. I wholeheartedly agree with Larry. Personally I looked for the first time near Python 3.3 after release of the first alpha (before a lot of years followed the development from a distance), but if alpha came out much earlier and would be less mature, I would have probably ignored it. Of course, this is only my personal case, I can't speak for other people.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4