A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/121935.html below:

[Python-Dev] Benchmarking Python 3.3 against Python 2.7 (wide build)

[Python-Dev] Benchmarking Python 3.3 against Python 2.7 (wide build) [Python-Dev] Benchmarking Python 3.3 against Python 2.7 (wide build)Maciej Fijalkowski fijall at gmail.com
Mon Oct 1 09:44:25 CEST 2012
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> I am presenting the talk "Python 3.3: Trust Me, It's Better Than 2.7" as
> PyCon Argentina and Brasil (and US if they accept the talk). As part of that
> talk I need to be able to benchmark Python 3.3 against 2.7 (both from tip)
> using the unladen benchmarks (which now include benchmarks from PyPy that
> can be relatively easily ported to Python 3).
>

Hi Brett.

*If* you're talking about benchmarks, would be cool if you mention
that pypy is actually much faster on most of them. Also a very sad
fact is that a lot of actually interesting benchmarks don't work on
py3k (although a growing number). Twisted and sympy are very
informative for example
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4