RetroSearch Browse

Mon Oct 1 03:41:30 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/121929.html

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org> wrote:

> Interesting results!
>
> Another data point for the benchmarks that would be interesting is memory
> consumption of the python process during the runs.
>
> In 3.3 a reasonable place to gather this would be to add a callback to the
> new gc.callbacks and save a snapshot of the process's memory usage before
> every collection to gather peak, average and median usage over the life of
> the process.  2.7 doesn't have this feature but there is a backport of this
> to 2.7 in the bugtracker.
>
> I guess I should join speed@ :)
>
>
There is already support in perf.py to track memory:

-m, --track_memory    Track memory usage. This only works on Linux.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120930/9f55a876/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/121929.html below:

[Python-Dev] Benchmarking Python 3.3 against Python 2.7 (wide build)