A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-November/122744.html below:

[Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict(), de fmd(**kw): return kw trumps all ; -)

[Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict(), de fmd(**kw): return kw trumps all ; -) [Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict(), de fmd(**kw): return kw trumps all ; -)Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Nov 15 11:48:27 CET 2012
martin at v.loewis.de wrote:
> It's faster than calling dict() because the dict code will
> create a second dictionary, and discard the keywords dictionary.

Perhaps in the case where dict() is called with keyword
args only, it could just return the passed-in keyword
dictionary instead of creating another one?

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4