A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-November/122727.html below:

[Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict()

[Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict() [Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict()Mark Adam dreamingforward at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 00:52:17 CET 2012
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
>> On 15/11/12 05:54, Mark Adam wrote:
>> Notice that I'm not merging one dict into another, but merging two dicts
>> into a third.
>
> Side point: Wouldn't it be quite logical to support dict addition?
>

Yes, but then you'd be in my old argument that dict should inherit from set.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4