A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-November/122702.html below:

[Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict()

[Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict() [Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict()Xavier Morel catch-all at masklinn.net
Wed Nov 14 19:12:25 CET 2012
On 2012-11-14, at 18:10 , Mark Adam wrote:
> 
> Try the canonical {'x':1}.  Only dict allows the special
> initialization above.  Other collections require an iterable.

Other collections don't have a choice, because it would often be
ambiguous. Dicts do not have that issue.

>  I'm guessing
> **kwargs initialization was only used because it is so simple to
> implement, but that's not necessarily a heuristic for good language design.

In this case it very much is, it permits easily merging two dicts in a
single expression or cloning-with-replacement. It also mirrors the
signature of dict.update which I think is a Good Thing.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4