On 07.11.12 17:12, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Since you've indicated the implementation is in the wrong here and you > also want to preserve opcode semantics, I think Skip's patch is > correct, but also needs to be applied to dict comprehensions (now we > have them). The extra bytecode is only ROT_TWO, which is one of the > cheapest we have kicking around :) Not only to dict comprehensions, but also to item assignments. It will be weird if a dict comprehension and a plain loop will be inconsistent.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4