Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-November/122532.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> Issue filed for the performance issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue16390
>
> With that change and running on tip of Mako on my laptop now reports 1.25x
> slower which is much better than it was. This performance issue might also
> explain why all of the regex compilation benchmarks are worse under Python
> 3.3 by a decent margin.
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Philip Jenvey <pjenvey at underboss.org> wrote:
>>
>> lru_cache on re._compile_typed

I would like to warn you about modifying benchmarks like this (or
frameworks). Why is it relevant anyway?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4