RetroSearch Browse

Sat Nov 3 04:10:23 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-November/122526.html

On 11/2/2012 10:04 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
>>> The way to resolve a proposal
>>>
>>> like that is to put it forward as a PEP, and explain the rationale for
>>> treating IDLE differently.
>>
>>
>> A PEP seems like overkill to me. The matter is a rule clarification, not an
>> enhancement proposal. The rationale is simple.
>
> If you don't want to run the risk of needing to rehash this discussion
> every time an IDLE feature addition is made in maintenance branches,
> write the rules down in a PEP.
[snip reasons]
OK, I am convinced an info PEP would be a good idea.

--
Terry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-November/122526.html below:

[Python-Dev] Cut/Copy/Paste items in IDLE right click context menu