Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-November/122522.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Issue filed for the performance issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue16390

With that change and running on tip of Mako on my laptop now reports 1.25x
slower which is *much* better than it was. This performance issue might
also explain why all of the regex compilation benchmarks are worse under
Python 3.3 by a decent margin.

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Philip Jenvey <pjenvey at underboss.org> wrote:

> lru_cache on re._compile_typed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121102/40045126/attachment.html>

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4