2012/5/31 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Mark Shannon <mark at hotpy.org> wrote: >> Eric Snow wrote: >>> >>> The implementation for sys.implementation is going to use a new (but >>> "private") type[1]. It's basically equivalent to the following: >> >> >> Does this really need to be written in C rather than Python? > > Yes, because we want to use it in the sys module. As you get lower > down in the interpreter stack, implementing things in Python actually > starts getting painful because of bootstrapping issues (e.g. that's > why both _structseq and collections.namedtuple exist). sys.implementation could be added by site or some other startup file. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4