RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 31 11:28:42 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119772.html

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:21:36AM -0600, Eric Snow wrote:

> 1. should we make the new type un-instantiable (null out tp_new and tp_init)?

Please don't. "Consenting adults" and all that. There's little things 
more frustrating that having a working type that does exactly what you 
want, except that some B&D coder has made it un-instantiable.

Leave it undocumented and/or a single underscore name for the time 
being, with an aim to make it public in 3.4 if it is useful and there 
are no major objections.

-- 
Steven

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119772.html below:

[Python-Dev] a new type for sys.implementation