I'm not clear on why this is a metaclass rather than a simple class decorator. On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:54 AM, r.david.murray <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: > + In a _params dictioanry, the keys become part of the name of the generated > + tests. In a _params list, the values in the list are converted into a > + string by joining the string values of the elements of the tuple by '_' and > + converting any blanks into '_'s, and this become part of the name. The > + full name of a generated test is the portion of the _params name before the > + '_params' portion, plus an '_', plus the name derived as explained above. Your description doesn't match your examples or implementation. Assuming the example and implementation are correct (and they look more sensible than the currently described approach), I believe that last sentence should be: "The full name of a generated test is a 'test_' prefix, the portion of the test function name after the '_as_' separator, plus an '_', plus the name derived as explained above." Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4