On Mon, 28 May 2012 21:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Antoine Pitrou <solipsis <at> pitrou.net> writes: > > > Not necessarily, but OTOH, it is not really standard procedure to > > commit half-finished patches. > > I didn't want to miss the window for the upcoming alpha, and and I'm not sure > exactly how things will pan out with respect to PEP 397 and packaging. If people > generally feel strongly about this, I can delete the .exe and re-introduce it > later if/when appropriate. It might have had a few rough edges, but I wouldn't > have characterised the patch as "half-finished" - that seems a little harsh :-) Yes, I shouldn't have said that. "Unfinished" is more appropriate. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4