RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 21 18:03:31 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119593.html

On 5/21/2012 3:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

> docs.python.org/latest
> docs.python.org/dev
> docs.python.org/3.2
> docs.python.org/3.1
> docs.python.org/2.7
> docs.python.org/2.6
> etc...

This looks great except for 'latest', which is ambiguous and awkward.

Like Guido, I would have docs2 and docs3 link to the latest of each 
series. This gives both series equal billing. docs itself could then 
become a *neutral* index page. In retrospect, I wish we had done this a 
year ago.

This design would continue to work if and when we need docs4.python.org.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119593.html below:

[Python-Dev] docs.python.org pointing to Python 3 by default?