2012/5/20 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: > PEP 3135 defines the new zero-argument form of super() as implicitly > equivalent to super(__class__, <first argument>), and up until 3.2 has > behaved accordingly: if you accessed __class__ from inside a method, > you would receive a reference to the lexically containing class. I don't understand why PEP 3135 cares how it's implemented. It's silly enough that you can get the class by "using" super (even just referencing the name). Thus that you can get __class__ reeks of more an implementation detail than a feature to me. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4