-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/12/2012 08:04 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Eric Snow > <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote: >> If anyone has strong feelings for item-access over >> attribute-access, please elaborate. I'm just not seeing it as that >> important and would rather finish up the PEP as simply as possible. > > I object to adding a new type to the stdlib just for this PEP. Since > iterating over the keys is significantly more useful than iterating > over the values, that suggests a dictionary as the most appropriate > type. Why would anyone want to iterate over either of them? Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+ulP8ACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4OzACgwnmVgJzE+IdEdS0Ij1J357di bnoAni5nUCIDcZt7dwEOfLLPUZoJQYF9 =t05/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4