> We've been over this before: collections.namedtuple *is* the standard > library's answer for structured records. And I think it's a really ugly answer, and one that deserves a parallel that is not a tuple. If this is contentious, I'll write a PEP. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4