Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119409.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Coghlan wrote:
> In that case, consider me convinced: static method it
> is.

-0.93. Static methods are generally unpythonic, IMO.

Python is not Java -- we have modules. Something should
only go in a class namespace if it somehow relates to
that particular class, and other classes could might
implement it differently. That's not the case with
build_class().

-- 
Greg

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4