On May 09, 2012, at 05:20 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Ah, good point. In that case, consider me convinced: static method it
>is. It can join mro() as the second non-underscore method defined on
>type().
+1
If I may dip into the bikeshed paint once more. I think it would be useful to
establish a naming convention for alternative constructors implemented as
{static,class}methods. I don't like `build_class()` much. Would you be
opposed to `type.new()`?
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4