Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119398.html below:

[Python-Dev] Rietveld integration problem?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Allow use of sphinx-autodoc in the standard library documentation?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I recently added an issue

http://bugs.python.org/issue14712

to track PEP 405 integration. The code is in my sandbox repo, and I've created a
patch using the "Create Patch" button on the tracker. The diff has been created,
but I don't seem to see a "review" link to Rietveld. The issue is on Rietveld
but for some reason the patch set hasn't attached to it. An earlier version of
the patch (which I've since unlinked) had the same problem - even after several
days, the "review" link never appeared. It's done so automatically in the past,
e.g. for issue

http://bugs.python.org/issue1521950

Is it something I'm doing wrong, or is there a problem with the issue
tracker/Rietveld integration?

Regards,

Vinay Sajip

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Allow use of sphinx-autodoc in the standard library documentation?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4