RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 8 18:50:44 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119362.html

On May 08, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

>No, the "mcl" in the call is just the designated metaclass - the
>*actual* metaclass of the resulting class definition may be something
>different. That's why this is a separate method from mcl.__new__.

I'm not completely sold on adding a class method to type, but I acknowledge
that it's a convenient place to put it.  Still, it doesn't feel particularly
more right than adding it to say, the operator module.  I don't think we have
any class methods on type yet, so this would be setting a precedence that we
should be sure we want to establish.

Cheers,
-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119362.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3