RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 8 00:59:36 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119348.html

Nick Coghlan wrote:

> Instead, I'm now thinking we should add a _types C extension module
> and expose the new function as types.build_class(). I don't want to
> add an entire new module just for this feature, and the types module
> seems like an appropriate home for it.

Dunno. Currently the only thing the types module contains is
types. A function would seem a bit out of place there.

I don't think there's too much wrong with putting it in the
operators module -- it's a function doing something that is
otherwise expressed by special syntax.

-- 
Greg

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119348.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3