07.05.12 18:48, Serhiy Storchaka написав(ла): > My fault. However, it's not my fault. I suggested `newlen < (PY_SSIZE_T_MAX - PY_SSIZE_T_MAX / 5)` and not `newlen <= (PY_SSIZE_T_MAX - PY_SSIZE_T_MAX / 5)`. In this case, there is no overflow.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4