On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > As for build_class: at the moment the types module really only has types, > and to add build_class there is just about as weird as in operator IMO. Oh no, types is definitely less weird - at least it's related to the type system, whereas the operator module is about operator syntax (attrgetter, itemgetter and index are at least related to the dot operator and subscripting syntax) Benjamin's suggestion of a class method on type may be a good one, though. Then the invocation (using all arguments) would be: mcl.build_class(name, bases, keywords, exec_body) Works for me, so unless someone else can see a problem I've missed, we'll go with that. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4