Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119260.html below:

[Python-Dev] Does trunk still support any compilers that *don't* allow declaring variables after code?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Does trunk still support any compilers that *don't* allow declaring variables after code?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Does trunk still support any compilers that *don't* allow declaring variables after code?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I don't have the time to figure it out right now, but I'll look more
> into it later.

I recently did an analysis here:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115375.html

The motivation for C++ compilation is gone meanwhile, as VS now supports
C in WinRT apps quite well. However, the conclusions still stand: dealing
with static type objects will be tricky.

Of course, I would also like to eliminate static type objects as much
as possible.

This then leaves the issue with the casts, which might be considered clutter.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Does trunk still support any compilers that *don't* allow declaring variables after code?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Does trunk still support any compilers that *don't* allow declaring variables after code?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4