On Wed, 02 May 2012 21:37:35 +0800, Matt Joiner <anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700 > > Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > > > > > > I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name > > > rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even that > > > compiler added this extension in the early 90s. > > > > > > Do we officially support any C compilers that *don't* permit > > > "intermingled variable declarations and code"? Do we *unofficially* > > > support any? And if we do, what do we gain? > > > > Well, there's this one called MSVC, which we support quite officially. > > Not sure if comic genius or can't rhyme. I had trouble with that rhyme, and I (unlike Antoine) am a native English speaker. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4