RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 1 22:12:10 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119180.html

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:26, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 2012-05-01, at 7:57 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
> > With 3.3a3 tagged and the beta stage currently 2 months away, I would
> like
> > to draw your attention to the following list of possible features for 3.3
> > as specified by PEP 398:
> >
> > Candidate PEPs:
> >
> > * PEP 362: Function Signature Object
>
> Regarding PEP 362: there are some outstanding issues with the PEP, that
> should
> be resolved.  I've outlined some in this email:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117540.html
>
> If Brett is tied up with the importlib integration,

Yes I am. =)

> I'd be glad to offer my
> help with adjustment of the PEP and reference implementation update.
>

That would be great! First thing is addressing Guido's concerns from
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117515.html and then
handling any issues you found. Not sure if Larry was asking about this out
of curiosity or because he too wanted to help.

I think the overall trick is keeping the API simple so it's easy to use but
exposes what one could reasonably need (e.g. I wouldn't try to keep the
order of keyword-only arguments).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120501/a6f28d7e/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119180.html below:

[Python-Dev] Open PEPs and large-scale changes for 3.3