RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 1 17:12:52 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119172.html

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 16:43, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
> 2012/5/1 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com>:
>> Will this package go through the provisional state mandated by PEP 411 ?
>
> I don't see PEP 411 requiring any module to go through its process.
>

You're right, it doesn't require it. However, since Nick's summary
above mentioned a "draft API", I thought this package can be a good
candidate for a PEP-411-process. Without PEP 411, once a module gets
into stdlib, its API is pretty much locked. If we are wary of such
lock-in with the current state ipaddr's API is in, PEP 411 seems like
a reasonable way to go.

Eli

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119172.html below:

[Python-Dev] Open PEPs and large-scale changes for 3.3