On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > So I think we should define correct behavior of pytz as use with the latest > Olson database. Use with an older version would then be a 'bug' subject to > being fixed. On Windows, we could update as needed with every bugfix > release. (And give instructions for user update.) On other systems, users > can do whatever is appropriate. Or perhaps we could add an 'update tz > database' function to the module. > Please, don't add updating function to standard lib. It's nightmare for package maintainers. In general I'm +0 for adding tz database to stdlib. -- Thanks, Andrew Svetlov
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4