RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 30 05:48:42 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/118286.html

Zitat von Brian Curtin <brian at python.org>:

> After talking with Martin and several others during the language
> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
> remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old
> feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even
> need to continue the PEP process?

I don't think PEP 397 can be accepted as it stands; it has too many
open issues. However, I am in favor of accepting the proposed feature.

Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly.
I thought you offered to rewrite it. Formally, I could accept the
PEP being withdrawn, and the feature integrated anyway, but I still
consider that bad style.

So: I can offer to rewrite the PEP to give a full specification
of the feature. It might be that I still need some help to
provide end-user prose in the PEP if people would want to see that as
well.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/118286.html below:

[Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher