RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 28 23:39:09 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/118241.html

I'm personally +1 for pytz only — dateutil is big enough and...
Well, can we just point to pytz in our docs for datetime module?

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> +1 If pytz is py3k cabable. -1 for dateutIl.
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
>>
>> I figured out what pytz and dateutil are not mentioned in python docs
>> for datetime module.
>> It's clean why these libs is not a part of Python Libraries — but
>> that's not clean for Docs.
>> From my perspective at least pytz (as py3k compatible) should to be
>> mentioned as the library which contains timezone info, supported
>> carefully and recommended to use with datetime standard module,
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew Svetlov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-Dev mailing list
>> Python-Dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>> Unsubscribe:
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

-- 
Thanks,
Andrew Svetlov

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/118241.html below:

[Python-Dev] datetime module and pytz with dateutil