On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:05:59 +1100, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > +1 on Nick's suggestion of try_monotonic. It is clear and obvious and doesn't > mislead. How about "monotonicest". (No, this is not really a serious suggestion.) However, time.steadiest might actually work. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4