Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > Not with just a header. http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/Teach/IntroSES/ > is a (very primitive and not stylistically improved in years) example > of a frame-based layout that I use some of my classes. I would > put a search field in the top frame (if I had one. :-) But I suppose you > would find the fixed sidebar distracting. No, if the whole sidebar is fixed I don't mind (though I'm not a fan of frames). The top frame takes up space though. > > In general fixed elements distract me > > greatly. This also applies to the '<<' element in the collapsible > > sidebar. When I'm scrolling, it's almost the center of my attention > > (when I should be focusing on the text). > > I suspect you're unusual in that, but I guess it just is going > to bug you no matter what, and I personally don't have > *that* strong a preference either way. Maybe. It's hard to determine. It's just that I don't see fixed search boxes or fixed elements like '<<' on big name websites (who may or may not have usability departments). So it is at least possible that such features have always been controversial. Stefan Krah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4