On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:38:19 -0500 Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 18:38, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2012-03-23, at 7:28 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: > >> This seems like it should have been a PEP, or maybe should become a PEP. > > > > Why? AFAIK Victor just proposes to add two new functions: monotonic() and > > steady(). > > We just previously had "Drop time.monotonic() function, rename > time.wallclock() to time.steady()" checked in a few weeks ago, and now > we're renaming a variation on time.steady to time.monotonic? What's > the next move? > > I'm not paying close attention here but there's a lot of movement > going on. Figuring out the API before we get too deep is probably a > good idea. Agreed with Brian. Obviously the API needs further discussion, judging by Victor's own multiple changes of mind on the subject. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4