Le 06/03/2012 15:31, Giampaolo Rodolà a écrit : > That's why I once proposed to include whatsnew.rst changes every time > a new feature is added/committed. > Assigning that effort to the release manager or whoever is supposed to > take care of this, is both impractical and prone to forgetfulness. Well, it’s the call of the whatsnew author. I think amk wrote the original instructions at the top of each whatsnew file which explain that NEWS is the primary location for logging changes and whatsnew is composed from that file. If Raymond or the new whatsnew author wants to change the rules so that important changes are noted in whatsnew in addition to NEWS, nothing prevents that. Cheers
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4