RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 22 01:09:22 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117935.html

Huan Do wrote:
> *Hi,
> 
> I am a graduating Berkeley student that loves python and would like to 
> propose an enhancement to python. My proposal introduces a concept of 
> slicing generator. For instance, if one does x[:] it returns a list 
> which is a copy of x. Sometimes programmers would want to iterate over a 
> slice of x, but they do not like the overhead of constructing another 
> list. Instead we can create a similar operator that returns a generator. 
> My proposed syntax is x(:). The programmers are of course able to set 
> lower, upper, and step size like the following.
> 
> x(1::-1)

The biggest problem with your proposal is that generators don't remember 
what they have already yielded, so

x(:) != x(:) # first time gets everything, second time gets nothing

~Ethan~

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117935.html below:

[Python-Dev] New PEP