On 3/20/2012 1:19 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Somewhat. I don't really object to #1, but mildly object to #2. I also
> note that the proposals round the Lib directory seem to have
> disappeared. I assume those have been dropped - they were the ones I
> did object to.
They are of secondary importance to me, and I would be mostly ok to drop
them - but I would like to understand your objection.
I would like to know if you would object to user lib installs matching
the system install. I.e., would it cause problems with you if it were
just 'lib' everywhere, with no 'lib/python{version}'? It sounded like
adding the version directory was the issue.
Thanks,
VanCIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
U.S. Treasury Regulations, Haynes and Boone, LLP informs you that any
U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is confidential,
may be privileged and should be read or retained only by the intended
recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, please
immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4