RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 20 15:08:08 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117834.html

On 3/20/2012 5:48 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> While I'm still unclear on the actual benefits of this, Martin's
> approach strikes a reasonable compromise so I withdraw my objections.

Ok. I was out of town and so could not respond to most of the latest 
discussion.

A question for you Mark, Paul, (and anyone else): Éric correctly points 
out that there are actually two distinct changes proposed here:

1. Moving the Python binary
2. Changing from "Scripts" to "bin"

So far, the primary resistance seems to be to item #1 - moving the 
python binary. There have been a few people who have noted that #2 will 
require some code to change (i.e. Paul), but I don't see lots of resistance.

Am I reading you correctly?

Thanks,
Van

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117834.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python install layout and the PATH on win32