Nick Coghlan wrote: > Collapsing the address list has to build the result list anyway to > actually handle the deduplication part of its job, so returning a > concrete list makes sense in that case. Having only one function return a list instead of an iterator seems questionable. Depending on the code it could either keep track of what it has returned so far in a set and avoid duplication that way; or, just return an `iter(listobject)` instead of `listobject`. ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4