RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 15 00:38:02 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117671.html

On 13Mar2012 17:27, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
| I think wallclock() is an awkward name; in other contexts I've seen
| "wall clock time" used to mean the time that a clock on the wall would
| show, i.e. local time. This matches definition #1 of
| http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/W/wall-time.html (while yours matches
| #2 :-).

I think this also. A "wallclock()" function that did not return real world
elapsed time seconds would be misleading or at least disconcerting.

| Maybe it could be called realtime()?

"elapsedtime()?" It is getting a bit long though.

Cheers,
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

"Shot my dog today."
"Was he mad?"
"Well, he weren't too damned pleased."
        - Rick Tilson, rtilson at Sun.COM

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117671.html below:

[Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?