On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:17:06 -0400 > PJ Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > > That's not really the point; the frameworks that implement nonblocking > I/O > > by replacing the socket module (and Stackless is only one of many) won't > be > > using that code. > > Then they should also replace the select module. > That actually sounds like a good point. ;-) I'm not the maintainer of any of those frameworks, but IIRC some of them *do* replace it. Perhaps this would solve Stackless's problem here too? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120314/e87130df/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4