On 3/13/2012 9:57 PM, VanL wrote: > On Mar 13, 2012, at 8:37 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> The installation will end up in >> >> c:\python33\lib\python3.3 >> >> which has the software name and version twice in the path. >> >> Do we *really* need this? > > We *already* have this. The only difference in this proposal is that we go from py_version_nodot to py_version_short, i.e. from > > c:\python33\lib\python33 > > to > > c:\python33\lib\python3.3 > > Given that we already repeat it, isn't it better to be consistent? > Is it? I think you are confusing two different configuration sections in sysconfig.cfg: [nt] stdlib = {base}/Lib platstdlib = {base}/Lib purelib = {base}/Lib/site-packages platlib = {base}/Lib/site-packages include = {base}/Include platinclude = {base}/Include scripts = {base}/Scripts data = {base} [nt_user] stdlib = {userbase}/Python{py_version_nodot} platstdlib = {userbase}/Python{py_version_nodot} purelib = {userbase}/Python{py_version_nodot}/site-packages platlib = {userbase}/Python{py_version_nodot}/site-packages include = {userbase}/Python{py_version_nodot}/Include scripts = {userbase}/Scripts data = {userbase} -- Scott Dial scott at scottdial.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4