RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 14 13:27:47 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117610.html

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:27:19 +0100
Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> monotonic() may not be the best name in this case. Jeffrey Yasskin
> proposed time.steady_clock(), so time.steady_clock(monotonic=False)?

I don't know what "steady" is supposed to mean here, so perhaps the
best solution is to improve the doc?

Also, "monotonic=False" implies that it won't be monotonic, which is
false.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117610.html below:

[Python-Dev] Drop the new time.wallclock() function?