A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117605.html below:

[Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives

[Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternativesMark Shannon mark at hotpy.org
Wed Mar 14 11:05:11 CET 2012
Stefan Krah wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
>>> For instance I have several one line patches languishing, I can't imagine
>>> how disappointing it would be to have significantly larger patches ignored,
>>> but it happens.
>> Can you give a pointer to these one-liners?
> 
> Almost a one-liner, but vast knowledge required (how do you prove that
> using (freefunc) is safe if it's the first usage in the tree?).
> 
> http://bugs.python.org/file21610/atexit-leak.patch
> 

But how do you find issues?

I want to do some reviews, but I don't want to wade through issues on
components I know little or nothing about in order to find the ones I 
can review.

There does not seem to be a way to filter search results in the tracker.

Cheers,
Mark
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4