On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 04:26:16 +0000 Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at ccpgames.com> wrote: > Hi there. > I want to mention some issues I've had with the socketserver module, and discuss if there's a way to make it nicer. > So, for a long time we were able to create magic stackless mixin classes for > it, like ThreadingMixIn, and assuming we had the appropriate socket > replacement library, be able to use it nicely using tasklets. I don't really think the ability to "create magic stackless mixin classes" should be a driving principle for the stdlib. I would suggest using a proper non-blocking framework such as Twisted. > So, my first question is: Why not simply rely on the already built-in timeout > support in the socket module? In case you didn't notice, the built-in timeout support *also* uses select(). Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4