RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 13 05:43:49 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117530.html

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote:
> Downloads don't mean the code is good. Voting is gamed. I really don't
> think there's a good automated solution to tell us what the
> high-quality replacement projects are.

Sure, these are imperfect metrics. But not having any metrics at all
is flawed too. Despite the huge flamewar we had 1-2 years ago about
PyPI comments, I think we should follow the lead of the many app
stores that pop up on the web -- users will recognize the pattern and
will tune their skepticism sensors as needed.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117530.html below:

[Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives