And of course I meant import-sig. -- Eric. "Eric V. Smith" <eric at trueblade.com> wrote: I think restarting the discussion anew here on distutils-sig is appropriate. -- Eric. Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: Martin has asked me to decide on PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages) in time for inclusion of the decision in Python 3.3. As people who attended the language-sig know, I am leaning towards PEP 402 but I admit that at this point I don't have enough information. If I have questions, should I be asking them on the import-sig or on python-dev? Is it tolerable if I ask questions even if the answer is somewhere in the archives? (I spent a lot of time reviewing the "pitchfork thread", http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064400.html, but that wasn't particularly fruitful, so I'm worried I'd just waste my time browsing the archives -- if the PEP authors did their jobs well the PEPs should include summaries of the discussion anyways.) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _____________________________________________ Import-SIG mailing list Import-SIG at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/import-sig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120311/a3246840/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4